Yes No Share to Facebook
Claiming Disgorgement Remedy
Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer
Last Updated: July 02 2026
Question: Can a victim in Ontario still recover money if the wrongdoer profited from the misconduct but I did not suffer much loss?
Answer: Pollock Paralegal Paralegal can help you assess whether a disgorgement or other restitutionary claim for “profiting from wrong” may be available in Ontario when a defendant’s ill-gotten gains were made possible by an underlying legal wrong, especially if the ordinary damages remedy is inadequate, and courts may order disgorgement to prevent the wrongdoer from benefiting from the wrongdoing; in particular, Ontario cases such as Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534 discuss the approach to disgorgement under unjust enrichment principles and corresponding deprivation. For a clear next step, you can call (519) 694-0363 to book a free 15-minute consultation and talk through the facts, potential claims, and evidence needed, with service across Ontario.
What Can a Victim of Wrongdoing Claim In a Lawsuit If the Victim Was Without the Suffering of a Loss But the Wrongdoer Received a Benefit or Profit From the Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
In some circumstances a wrongdoer may receive a benefit or profit arising from the wrongdoing while little, if any, loss or harm arises to the victim of the wrongdoing. Whereas the law generally forbid a person from suing unless a loss or harm has occurred per no harm, no foul principles, a valid lawsuit may involve claims for the illegitimate benefits or profits arising from the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
The Law
Disgorgement remedy, as a stripping of ill gotten gains from a wrongdoer, was well explained within the Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, case wherein it was stated:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
There may be circumstances where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud, among other wrongs, without causing harm or loss to the wronged person and yet benefits or profits arise in favour of the wrongdoer. The law, applied by the courts, seeking to discourage and deter wrongful conduct, may order that the benefits or profits be disgorged from the wrongdoer and provided to the victim. In this way the remedy of disgorgement ensures that the wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and is, presumably, discouraged and deterred from engaging in wrongful conduct.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
NOTE: A large quantity of inquiries related to “lawyers nearby” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates an urgency for competent legal counsel rather than identifying a particular job title. In Ontario, “licensed paralegals” fall under the regulation of the same Law Society that governs lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specified litigation scenarios. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedure are fundamental to this position. Pollock Paralegal provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy designed to secure efficient and favourable outcomes for clients.
