Yes No Share to Facebook
Small Claims Court Limit
Involves Net From Set-Off Upon Sum Assessed
Last Updated: August 23 2026
Question: In Ontario Small Claims Court, if a set-off is applicable and the assessed damages exceed the $35,000 limit, is the set-off amount calculated from the court’s $35,000 cap or from the assessed amount?
Answer: Pollock Paralegal can help you understand how Small Claims Court jurisdiction works when a set-off is involved. In general, the $35,000 monetary limit applies to the net judgment the court awards, not to the internal amount the court assesses before deductions. Where a set-off applies, it is calculated from the assessed amount (even if that assessed amount exceeds the limit) and then the net judgment is adjusted to stay within the $35,000 award cap, as confirmed in 2146100 Ontario Ltd. v. 2052750 Ontario Inc., 2013 ONSC 2483. For practical next steps on your claim or counterclaim, call (519) 694-0363 to speak with Pollock Paralegal (paralegal) for a clear plan and paperwork guidance.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
If a Set-Off Applies In a Small Claims Court Case, Is the Set-Off Amount Based Upon the Court Limit As a the Maximum Starting Point?
If the Small Claims Court Assesses a Sum That Is Higher Than the Maximum Award Amount Allowed, the Assessed Amount Is the Basis For Reduction By Any Set-Off; Nevertheless, the Total Amount Granted Must Be Within the Court Award Limit.
Note: Please contact Pollock Paralegal by phone at: (519) 694-0363 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
Understanding the Small Claims Court Jurisdiction to Award Judgment As Net Set-Off Despite An Above Limit Assessment
In the Small Claims Court, a limit of $35,000, exclusive of legal costs and interest, currently applies; however, this limit applies to the amount that may be awarded as a Judgment rather than a limit upon the sums that may be assessed by the Small Claims Court. Additionally, when a set-off amount is applicable, it is calculated from the assessed amount rather than from the cap upon the court award.
The Law
The 2146100 Ontario Ltd. v. 2052750 Ontario Inc., 2013 ONSC 2483, case confirms the point that the Small Claims Court may assess any sum of damages and may apply from that assessed sum, rather than apply from the monetary jurisdiction cap, an applicable set-off sum so long as the a net Judgment award remains within the court award limit. This basis for applying a set-off was confirmed whereas it was said:
[17] In terms of the case at bar, the respondents expressly set out in their defendants' claim that they were owed over $42,000 from the appellants. They limited their ultimate recovery, however, to $25,000. Whether that limit is arrived at through set-off or abandonment of any sum over and above the monetary jurisdiction of the court is immaterial in my view: see Dunbar v. Helicon Properties Ltd., 2006 CanLII 25262 (ON SCDC), [2006] O.J. No. 2992, 2006 CarswellOnt 4580, 213 O.A.C. 296 (Div. Ct.).
[18] The respondents claimed a judgment of $25,000. They were awarded a judgment of $21,538.85. In my view, the process amounted to nothing more than the trial judge starting at $42,633 and making deductions for amounts owed to the plaintiff, to arrive at a net figure within the monetary jurisdiction of the court. This process is logically no different than assessing the value of a contract at $50,000, determining that $30,000 had been paid under the contract, leaving a balance owing of $20,000. There could be no doubt, in those circumstances, that the deputy judge had the jurisdiction to make a finding that the initial value of the contract was an amount in excess of the monetary limit of the court. But at the end of the day, it is the net judgment that matters. Here, the amount awarded was within the monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court and did not exceed the amount claimed in the defendants' claim.
Within the 2146100 case, the Judge assessed slightly more than $42,000 on a counterclaim as brought against the Plaintiff. The Judge then went on to assess slightly more than $21,000 as due from the Defendant to the Plaintiff. When determining the net Judgment award due, the Judge used the $42,000 assessed amount and applied the $21,000 set-off amount. Subsequently, upon Appeal, it was argued that the set-off should be calculated from the court jurisdiction limit rather than the assessed amount. The Divisional Court disagreed with the argument and upheld the Judgment from Trial.
Summary Comment
The Small Claims Court monetary jurisdiction limit applies to the amount which the court may award rather than the amount the court may assess. Furthermore, in cases where a set-off calculation is involved, the set-off is taken from the assessed sum rather than from the Small Claims Court limit.
NOTE: A considerable volume of enquiries related to “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically indicates an urgent need for reliable legal support rather than a particular professional designation. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specified litigation matters. Advocacy, legal insight, and procedural expertise are pivotal to that function. Pollock Paralegal provides legal representation within its licensed scope, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and effective advocacy aimed at securing efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.